Hollow Front have premiered a new video for their new song “To The Ashes.” You can watch that below:
As previously reported, Mötley Crüe recently scored a victory amid their legal dispute with ex-guitarist Mick Mars. Arbitrator Patrick J. Walsh ruled that Mars gave up his right to touring revenue upon his departure. He was also ordered to pay over $750,000 in unrecouped tour advances and had to recant his claims regarding the band’s use of pre-recorded tracks. Now, Mars’ lawyer Ed McPherson has commented on the ruling via Rolling Stone:
“The decision is awful. It’s not fair. This band has never been fair to Mick. When Mick said ‘I can’t tour anymore because of a hideous disease, but I can still write, perform one-offs or residencies and record,’ they said, ‘Sorry, Mick. It’s been 43 years, but you’re out. Goodbye, and we don’t want to pay you anymore.’ This arbitrator said it’s fine. We need to figure out if we’re going to challenge [the decision]. It’s ridiculous. It’s just a question of whether he wants to keep pursuing this. Basically, he’s over Mötley Crüe.”

Deep Purple are currently finishing up a new album. The effort is expected to be released in June.

Singer Ian Gillan told Songwriting For Songwriters the following about the record:
“Well, it’s very interesting on this one. I can’t give you too much at this stage, but it’s basically very optimistic. Let’s say there’s a general theme. It’s a fairly loose conceptual idea of the end of humanity, but not as grim as it sounds. In fact, it’s very optimistic. It’s about the metamorphosis of humanity into a metaphysical state, our next incarnation. It’s a bit too early to be doing interviews about this. I don’t mean time of day. I mean, it’s not gonna be out until June, so I don’t want to give too much away.”
He also added the following about the songwriting process and his chemistry with guitarists:
“It’s very important, obviously. But at the same time you’ve got to ignore it. I’ve got an idea that came to me a long time ago with DEEP PURPLE. But when you’re writing like that, as opposed to sitting down with a co-writer or on your own with a guitar and you’re writing the entire thing, then there are no boundaries, really. But with a band, you are very much confined by what you’re given. For example, the working practice of PURPLE has always been the same. We go to a place for a week or 10 days and go into the office every day — start at noon, finish at six and stop for tea at three o’clock. It’s like going to the office. And the guys just start playing, and it’s all improvised. You have no idea. If you were a listener, you’d think you might be hearing the preparation for something operatic or a mood music for a yoga or massage parlor or you might be in a jazz club or hearing some blues or rock or soul, any kind of thing that came to their mind. These are great players, and so the music evolves, as I say, and then dramatically switches into something else. So basically it’s a week-long or eight-day jam. And every now and again, somebody nods to somebody else and says, ‘Okay, that’s worth keeping,’ an idea, a mood, a rhythm, a sequence, or anything like that, and we record it and come back at the end of the session with probably 35 or 40 ideas. And the next session is much the same. We trim it down and then add some more, and trim it down to 30 ideas, and it gradually evolves. Now, I don’t have much choice, really, other than to say, ‘Well, perhaps there’s too many verses there,’ or ‘we need a little bit here’, or a section or a middle eight there or whatever. But basically it’s the guys putting the songs together. And I just have to — what I call — ride the pony. And when it comes to sitting down alone and shaping my contribution, I’ve gotta pretty much fit in. But then again, it’s easy to be overwhelmed with something like that because it’s a hell of a challenge. So I’ve got this attitude, I’ve gotta take over, I’ve gotta dominate completely and make it sound not as if I’m hopping on afterwards, but as if the whole idea came from the song first. It’s a reversal. So I’ve got complete freedom in terms of lyrics, but obviously there’s a mood thing. And it’s gotta fit with the songs. And, obviously, I liked in more recent years, particularly, to have a concept for the album that basically hangs things together. The last album was called ‘=1’ and it was all about my frustration with the complexities of life these days and so forth.”
[via Blabbermouth]
As previously reported, Poison drummer Rikki Rockett recently claimed the band scrapped their “Look What The Cat Dragged In” 40th anniversary tour after singer Bret Michaels requested six times the money of his bandmates. However, Michaels denied those claims and said that the trek would be happening in 2027. Now, Rockett has confirmed that there are plans to hit the stage next year.

Rockett said the following during an appearance on SiriusXM’s “Trunk Nation With Eddie Trunk”:
“You know what?! Bret and I had texted this morning. And by the way, none of this just came from me. It’s just I happened to be doing the interview because [I was being inducted into] the Metal Hall Of Fame. So I was doing the interview with New York Post, among many other outlets, but they’re the ones that had asked me about the tour. And so the reason I said what I said is because… All the information I had was the truth, from my standpoint. And a lot of people, they start assuming things. I was seeing stuff on social media: ‘Oh, Rikki has cancer again.’ Or ‘C.C.’s [DeVille, POISON guitarist] off the wagon again’ or all these different things. ‘Those guys don’t really wanna work’ and ‘Bret wants to work’. And none of those things are true. We do wanna work, all of us do wanna work. C.C.’s sober. I don’t have cancer. None of those things are true.
But Bret’s right. We didn’t sit down at a negotiating table, really. It never did get that far. It got kiboshed at the very beginning. But I just wanted to put a sensible reason to it so that everybody understands that it wasn’t Bobby [Dall, POISON bassist], C.C. or me, any of those rumors you heard, that’s not why we weren’t touring. And so I have to answer it with something.”
He continued when asked about his claims regarding the alleged financial dispute:
“I was told what Bret wanted, and when you did the math, that’s how the math worked out. And I’m not trying to quarrel with Bret. And I do think that we’re gonna do something in ’27.”
He went on to discuss the band’s 2027 tour plans:
“That’s one of the things, main things, that Bret and I talked about. I think what we want is we wanna celebrate — it’ll be 41 years, right? — but we wanna celebrate 40-plus years with the four of us with fans. That’s what we wanna do. And it sounds. like a cheesy slogan or something, but honestly, we do. So it’s gonna happen for sure at some point. It’s not gonna happen in ’26 — we just can’t make it happen that fast — but it is gonna happen. And there’s no more of a headline to stick out there — all the low-hanging-fruit media out there that tries to find a headline — there’s nothing there, really. I said what I said, Bret said what he said, but today we’re talking about doing something in ’27, and I know Bobby wants to do it, I talk to C.C. all the time. We’re all on board. So I think it’s gonna happen. God forbid — we’re all in good health and all that stuff, so I look forward to it.”
He also added the following about his text exchange with Michaels after being asked if it was positive:
“It was absolutely positive. We had a good laugh. Of course we talked a little bit. I told him why that information went out, and I just told you. But there’s no second shoe to drop. Honestly, we wanna do the tour. It’s gonna be delayed now till ’27, but I think it’s gonna happen in ’27, which is perfect POISON. A 41st anniversary is, like, fricking amazing, right? [Laughs]”
[via Blabbermouth]
You must be logged in to post a comment.